View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001756 | unreal | ircd | public | 2004-04-23 15:51 | 2012-08-17 13:40 |
| Reporter | syzop | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
| Product Version | 3.3-alpha0 | ||||
| Summary | 0001756: *** Notice -- Overflowed unzipbuf increase UNZIP_BUFFER_SIZE | ||||
| Description | [19:01] <Jedi> for some reason we are getting these messages on all of our servers but not at the same time [14:37] -server.server.server- *** Notice -- Overflowed unzipbuf increase UNZIP_BUFFER_SIZE [19:01] <Jedi> just out of the blue [..] [19:02] <Jedi> rest of it is [14:37] *** Notice -- inflate() error: * Are you perhaps linking zipped with non-zipped? * [19:02] <Jedi> [14:37] *** Notice -- inflate() error(-3): invalid literal/length code [19:02] <Jedi> [14:37] *** Notice -- Hint: link::options::zip should be the same at both sides (either both disabled or both enabled) [19:02] <Jedi> then it disconnects [19:02] <Jedi> then relinks [19:03] <Stskeeps> hmmm. [19:03] <Stskeeps> 3.2-rc2? [19:03] <Jedi> yea [19:03] <Jedi> Unreal3.2-RC2fix. | ||||
| Additional Information | IF I read the code well then this happends it stuff is compressed "too good". ** snip zip.c: ** /* * On an hybrid test net, we kept filling up unzipbuf * original was 4*ZIP_BUFFER_SIZE * * -Dianora */ #define UNZIP_BUFFER_SIZE 6 * ZIP_BUFFER_SIZE Perhaps it's a good idea to up this a bit, like to 9 *.. (yes we are talking about 6*16k here.. but it's only for (zipped) server<->server links, so... :). I've asked the guy to change it to 9 *, we'll see how it goes. | ||||
| 3rd party modules | |||||
|
|
post-3.2. looks like hybrid uses some kind of loop instead of a error/warn... that would obviously be much better. Will take a look at that after 3.2 :). |
|
|
Still an issue? |
|
|
this error I never don't see. 3.2-RC? and zlib must be 1.2.3. imho |
|
|
-> 3.3. This pretty much never happens on 3.2.x - I haven't seen it since 3.2.8 at least when we bumped the value. |
|
|
No longer an issue. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-04-23 15:51 | syzop | New Issue | |
| 2004-04-23 23:25 | syzop | Note Added: 0005920 | |
| 2007-04-27 05:49 |
|
Note Added: 0013843 | |
| 2007-04-27 05:49 |
|
Status | new => feedback |
| 2007-04-27 05:49 |
|
View Status | private => public |
| 2007-04-27 06:10 | Bock | Note Added: 0013858 | |
| 2010-07-14 17:10 | syzop | QA | => Not touched yet by developer |
| 2010-07-14 17:10 | syzop | U4: Need for upstream patch | => No need for upstream InspIRCd patch |
| 2010-07-14 17:10 | syzop | U4: Upstream notification of bug | => Not decided |
| 2010-07-14 17:10 | syzop | U4: Contributor working on this | => None |
| 2010-07-14 17:10 | syzop | Note Added: 0016166 | |
| 2010-07-14 17:10 | syzop | Product Version | 3.2-RC2 => 3.3-alpha0 |
| 2012-08-17 13:40 | syzop | Note Added: 0017082 | |
| 2012-08-17 13:40 | syzop | Status | feedback => closed |
| 2012-08-17 13:40 | syzop | Resolution | open => no change required |
