View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0003246 | unreal | ircd | public | 2007-02-27 15:05 | 2019-10-14 15:59 |
| Reporter | novus | Assigned To | syzop | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
| Platform | i386 | OS | Linux | OS Version | 2.6.1 |
| Product Version | 3.2.1 | ||||
| Summary | 0003246: /silence | ||||
| Description | The silence command '/silence' adding new features and functionality Hello, i am not sure if i am doing this right, or if this is the right place to post this, sorry in advance, but i do have an idea i wish to see implemented in future builds, The /silence command, instead of just silencing a certain nick/[email protected], i would like to see it be able to silence a particular channel or all channels depending which one the client/user would wish to do. A new theoretical silence command with command line arguments should look like so Example: (1) /silence (-a) [#] where -a is for all, and '#' of course is for channels. Example: (2) /silence (-p) [#gromit] where -p is for a particular channel, and #gromit is the channel that is wanting to be ignored. Or you can use the wild card '*' to ignore channel(s) that start with a certain letter or partial word or have the 'letter' or partial word anywhere in the Channame. Example: (3) A certain letter /silence (-p) [#*g], and in other combinations [#g*] or[#*g*] Example: (4) Partial word /silence (-p) [#*grom*], and in other combinations as above. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| 3rd party modules | |||||
|
|
There's already a way to silence channels. /part And if you want to silence all channels? /join 0 |
|
|
Or you could have two connections to the network. Set user mode d on just one of them ^^ |
|
|
It was just an idea i had for a while, to have more flexibility and control over that command. Anyway, i was just wondering what people thought about it and if they would be willing to incorporate it in newer builds. |
|
|
Think I'd like to see this in a 3rd party module first |
|
|
I could leave this issue lingering but it's better to say that we are not considering this option at the moment or in the nearby feature, so let's close it. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-02-27 15:05 | novus | New Issue | |
| 2007-02-27 17:57 | aquanight | Note Added: 0013240 | |
| 2007-02-28 00:54 | Shining Phoenix | Note Added: 0013245 | |
| 2007-02-28 00:56 | Shining Phoenix | Note Edited: 0013245 | |
| 2007-02-28 08:10 | novus | Note Added: 0013246 | |
| 2007-04-27 03:12 |
|
Relationship added | child of 0003284 |
| 2007-04-27 03:12 |
|
Note Added: 0013768 | |
| 2007-04-27 03:12 |
|
Status | new => acknowledged |
| 2019-10-14 15:41 | syzop | Relationship deleted | child of 0003284 |
| 2019-10-14 15:59 | syzop | Assigned To | => syzop |
| 2019-10-14 15:59 | syzop | Status | acknowledged => closed |
| 2019-10-14 15:59 | syzop | Resolution | open => no change required |
| 2019-10-14 15:59 | syzop | Note Added: 0020990 |
