0001403: Banwalking for Globalops & Serveradmins

(0004200)
White_Magic (reporter)
2003-12-04 18:18

but to ban walk, doesnt they need oper override??, and if u dont have over ride u cant ban walk?? did i miss something?

(0004203)
m0wl (reporter)
2003-12-04 18:38

If you have can_override you can't banwalk in a +O channel as globalop and +A as a serveradmin, but you can remove the mode (O/A) from outside, so it's useless to deny banwalking if these modes are set if you can remove them.

(0004207)
w00t (reporter)
2003-12-04 23:55

Hm. Now m0wl does have a point there... but why bother when, as you said, you can unset those modes? Can someone define the term "banwalk" to me, im a bit in the dark there. Thanks in anticipation.

(0004214)
m0wl (reporter)
2003-12-05 16:06

Banwalk = joining although a ban is set against you (/invite me #channel & /join #channel on unreal)

(0004242)
w00t (reporter)
2003-12-08 01:39

ok

Understand and agree with m0wl now.

(0010987)
Zell (reporter)
2006-01-20 16:10

As of testing today, the bug is still there.

Is this going to be fixed for 3.2.4?

(0010990)
JasonTik (reporter)
2006-01-20 19:50

Perhaps we should consider that a global could also do a -O. (Admin doing it is already noted)

1) Not a bug
2) Probabaly not fixed for 3.2.4, because im helping alpha test it, and i havnt seen anything different about this.

(0011552)
Zell (reporter)
2006-04-13 21:55

Nope, not fixed.

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2003-12-01 19:44	m0wl	New Issue
2003-12-04 18:18	White_Magic	Note Added: 0004200
2003-12-04 18:38	m0wl	Note Added: 0004203
2003-12-04 23:55	w00t	Note Added: 0004207
2003-12-05 16:06	m0wl	Note Added: 0004214
2003-12-08 01:39	w00t	Note Added: 0004242
2004-02-25 17:24	Zell	Issue Monitored: Zell
2006-01-20 16:10	Zell	Note Added: 0010987
2006-01-20 19:50	JasonTik	Note Added: 0010990
2006-04-13 21:55	Zell	Note Added: 0011552
2006-11-16 16:31	aquanight	Category	documentation => ircd
2007-04-19 02:47	stskeeps	Relationship added	child of 0003049
2007-04-19 02:47	stskeeps	Status	new => acknowledged

Notes
(0004200) White_Magic (reporter) 2003-12-04 18:18	but to ban walk, doesnt they need oper override??, and if u dont have over ride u cant ban walk?? did i miss something?

(0004203) m0wl (reporter) 2003-12-04 18:38	If you have can_override you can't banwalk in a +O channel as globalop and +A as a serveradmin, but you can remove the mode (O/A) from outside, so it's useless to deny banwalking if these modes are set if you can remove them.

(0004207) w00t (reporter) 2003-12-04 23:55	Hm. Now m0wl does have a point there... but why bother when, as you said, you can unset those modes? Can someone define the term "banwalk" to me, im a bit in the dark there. Thanks in anticipation.

(0004214) m0wl (reporter) 2003-12-05 16:06	Banwalk = joining although a ban is set against you (/invite me #channel & /join #channel on unreal)

(0004242) w00t (reporter) 2003-12-08 01:39	ok Understand and agree with m0wl now.

(0010987) Zell (reporter) 2006-01-20 16:10	As of testing today, the bug is still there. Is this going to be fixed for 3.2.4?

(0010990) JasonTik (reporter) 2006-01-20 19:50	Perhaps we should consider that a global could also do a -O. (Admin doing it is already noted) 1) Not a bug 2) Probabaly not fixed for 3.2.4, because im helping alpha test it, and i havnt seen anything different about this.

(0011552) Zell (reporter) 2006-04-13 21:55	Nope, not fixed.