View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0001443unrealircdpublic2007-04-27 05:54
ReporterRocko Assigned To 
PrioritynormalSeverityfeatureReproducibilityalways
Status closedResolutionfixed 
Product Version3.2-beta19 
Summary0001443: Channel Ban List doesn't show the host of the user who set the ban.
DescriptionHi.

I tested the new ban types, and noticed, that UNREAL doesn't show the host of the user, who set the ban.

As example:
*** Rocko sets mode: +b blah!*@*
/mode #Help b
#Help blah!*@* set by Rocko (Sun Dec 21 13:36:33)
#Help End of Channel Ban List

When you do the same on bahamut, you get the following:
* Rocko sets mode: +b blah!*@*
/mode #Test1234 b
#Test1234 blah!*@* set by [email protected] (Sun Dec 21 13:56:34)
#Test1234 End of Channel Ban List

I have tested it with mIRC6.03(without any script) and compared it with bahamut, because my Script (mIRC6.03 + PnP4.22) shows the host on unreal too, but only when you are there when the ban is set, and when you rejoin, the information is gone, so there is only the nick, who set it.
I think Unreal doesn't support that, but the script do, so it get mixed.
Or is it a bug?
And when not, can it be added?

Thx anyway ;)

3rd party modules

Activities

Rocko

2003-12-21 13:01

reporter   ~0004392

Oh, I forgot something...

Something about the new ban types:

Is it normal, when you set
*** Rocko sets mode: +b ~q:*!*@space-1E30BBDB.g.pppool.de

that the user is able to change the nicks?

*** Parts: Heffer ([email protected]) (rejoining)
*** Joins: Heffer ([email protected])
*** Heffer is now known as Heffer2
*** Heffer2 is now known as Heffer

I am not sure, what the new ban types should do.
Maybe it's ok so :P

Rocko

2003-12-21 13:10

reporter   ~0004393

Oh btw...
I crashed Unreal using the part, where I asked, if it is normal that I can change Nicks ;)

I will open a new bug report ;P

syzop

2003-12-21 15:12

administrator   ~0004398

Yeah ~q is only "quiet" (see Changes or doc/unreal32docs.html ;p), so people are allowed to join, change nicks, etc.. but not able to speak (unless they have +v or higher).

codemastr

2004-01-18 16:47

reporter   ~0004731

Why exactly is showing the host information useful?

AI

2004-01-18 21:44

reporter   ~0004737

Does this crash bug on nick changes still affects ReleaseID (1.1.1.1.2.1.2.1.2.2050) ?

codemastr

2004-01-18 22:03

reporter   ~0004739

- As expected, fixed a crashbug in extended bans system. Reported by Rocko (0001444).

Nope, it's been fixed.

Rocko

2004-01-19 16:33

reporter   ~0004753

Well, why is it usefull...

Because it provide more information, about who set the host. OPs can use other idents/nicks/hosts temporarely.
Look at "TOPIC_NUHOST".. why is that usefull? The same reason for this here ;)

codemastr

2004-01-19 17:01

reporter   ~0004754

I don't think TOPIC_NUHOST is useful, so using that as an example doesn't prove anything to me. As you said, ops can use other nicks/idents/hosts, so how does showing the n!u@h solve anything? Your logic makes no sense.

abattoir

2004-02-14 09:22

reporter   ~0004993

Yes, it makes. n!u@h identifies the ban/topic writer more then the nick only. You cannot change your host unless you're an oper or have multi accounts. I think it would be usefull.

w00t

2004-03-11 18:16

reporter   ~0005434

Uuuh... Sorry. Ever heard of jIRC? CGI:IRC? Proxies?

It is ban evasion tactics...

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2003-12-21 12:58 Rocko New Issue
2003-12-21 13:01 Rocko Note Added: 0004392
2003-12-21 13:10 Rocko Note Added: 0004393
2003-12-21 15:12 syzop Note Added: 0004398
2004-01-18 16:47 codemastr Note Added: 0004731
2004-01-18 21:44 AI Note Added: 0004737
2004-01-18 22:03 codemastr Note Added: 0004739
2004-01-19 16:33 Rocko Note Added: 0004753
2004-01-19 17:01 codemastr Note Added: 0004754
2004-02-14 09:22 abattoir Note Added: 0004993
2004-03-11 18:16 w00t Note Added: 0005434
2007-04-27 05:54 stskeeps Status new => closed
2007-04-27 05:54 stskeeps Resolution open => fixed