0001522: /rehash all command - UnrealIRCd Bug Tracker

(0004900)
AngryWolf (reporter)
2004-02-07 18:11

Imagine an IRC network with two server admins (A and B) and five servers. The first admin (A) has only one server, the others are owned by the second one (B). Let's say, "B" made a change in his/her servers and now ready to rehash all of them with a single command (that is, /rehashall or something you are talking about). After done, "A" shouts "Hey! Who the hell rehashed my server? I haven't finished making changes in my conf files!" Now imagine what would happen on much bigger networks. :-) [Just my thoughts.]

(0004914)
syzop (administrator)
2004-02-09 04:41

[strange I thought I replied to this, ah well.. I guess I didn't hit the button or devel*/my isp was down..]

We COULD consider this... and perhaps only rehash remote includes... I mean, I don't find the idea totally stupid.. I thought about it too when I was on a network with remote includes and X servers, it would be very helpful.

Anyway, currently we are preparing for next release (and thus not really implementing new features), so I'll prolly consider this again at some later stage :).

(0013857)
stskeeps (reporter)
2007-04-27 06:09

Bump.

(0015310)
crucialstorm (reporter)
2008-06-22 22:51

I also requested this feature it would be so nice to have since i have 10 ircd accounts

(0016188)
syzop (administrator)
2010-07-14 21:08

I'll do this for 3.2.9 myself. I could 'assign' it right now, but I'm not yet working on it ;).

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2004-02-07 14:52	P	New Issue
2004-02-07 18:11	AngryWolf	Note Added: 0004900
2004-02-09 04:41	syzop	Note Added: 0004914
2007-04-27 06:09	stskeeps	Relationship added	child of 0003049
2007-04-27 06:09	stskeeps	Note Added: 0013857
2007-04-27 06:09	stskeeps	Status	new => feedback
2008-06-22 22:51	crucialstorm	Note Added: 0015310
2008-06-23 03:45	Stealth	Relationship added	has duplicate 0003707
2010-07-14 21:07	syzop	Relationship added	child of 0003776
2010-07-14 21:08	syzop	QA	=> Not touched yet by developer
2010-07-14 21:08	syzop	U4: Need for upstream patch	=> No need for upstream InspIRCd patch
2010-07-14 21:08	syzop	U4: Upstream notification of bug	=> Not decided
2010-07-14 21:08	syzop	U4: Contributor working on this	=> None
2010-07-14 21:08	syzop	Status	feedback => acknowledged
2010-07-14 21:08	syzop	Note Added: 0016188

Notes
(0004900) AngryWolf (reporter) 2004-02-07 18:11	Imagine an IRC network with two server admins (A and B) and five servers. The first admin (A) has only one server, the others are owned by the second one (B). Let's say, "B" made a change in his/her servers and now ready to rehash all of them with a single command (that is, /rehashall or something you are talking about). After done, "A" shouts "Hey! Who the hell rehashed my server? I haven't finished making changes in my conf files!" Now imagine what would happen on much bigger networks. :-) [Just my thoughts.]

(0004914) syzop (administrator) 2004-02-09 04:41	[strange I thought I replied to this, ah well.. I guess I didn't hit the button or devel*/my isp was down..] We COULD consider this... and perhaps only rehash remote includes... I mean, I don't find the idea totally stupid.. I thought about it too when I was on a network with remote includes and X servers, it would be very helpful. Anyway, currently we are preparing for next release (and thus not really implementing new features), so I'll prolly consider this again at some later stage :).

(0013857) stskeeps (reporter) 2007-04-27 06:09	Bump.

(0015310) crucialstorm (reporter) 2008-06-22 22:51	I also requested this feature it would be so nice to have since i have 10 ircd accounts

(0016188) syzop (administrator) 2010-07-14 21:08	I'll do this for 3.2.9 myself. I could 'assign' it right now, but I'm not yet working on it ;).