View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0003224 | unreal | ircd | public | 2007-02-02 13:44 | 2010-07-14 17:47 |
| Reporter | JasonTik | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | random |
| Status | closed | Resolution | duplicate | ||
| Product Version | 3.2.6 | ||||
| Summary | 0003224: A rehash is already in progress.... Forever. | ||||
| Description | I recently received the message "A rehash is already in progress". The rehash appeared hung forever. I am not certain, bug I suspect it has to do with a network or server error in retrieving the remote includes. This needs better error handling, it seems. It would be much better to fail than to hang forever. | ||||
| 3rd party modules | |||||
|
|
Remote includes need a timeout value...like 5 seconds maybe Is this possible with curl ? edit: actually, it seems there is already a 45 second timeout in remote includes... |
|
|
hmm, i believe i found an issue like this during testing and believed it to be fixed, i'll see if i cant find anything of it, but as it shows, it must not be fixed *shrugs* |
|
|
Usually when there is a timeout or something, it goes ERROR, and all is well. There is, however, though I cannot say what, an unhandled error somewhere. |
|
|
Maybe something like: set::remote-includes::timeout set::remote-includes::retries set::remote-includes::bind-ip Those 3 settings will be great for remote includes, and solve multiple issues :) EDIT: Typo |
|
|
set::remote-includes::bind-ip would prove to be useless as it can't possibly work, because of the way the conf file is parsed. Look at report 0003185 for a possible solution to that problem edit: actually, for that matter, all those settings are useless because of the way config files are parsed. |
|
|
There was supposed to be an error, and i think it had smth to do with its check wait time, but i havnt been able to locate it. give syzop or aqua a poke on #u-s and DEMAND they look at it |
|
|
Since we never heard of this again for the past 3 years, and the clear timeout of 45s, I think this can be closed.. See als Bricker's comments |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-02-02 13:44 | JasonTik | New Issue | |
| 2007-02-02 14:22 | djGrrr | Note Added: 0013160 | |
| 2007-02-02 14:28 | djGrrr | Note Edited: 0013160 | |
| 2007-02-02 20:36 | Bricker | Note Added: 0013165 | |
| 2007-02-04 13:32 | JasonTik | Note Added: 0013187 | |
| 2007-02-04 16:40 | Stealth | Note Added: 0013190 | |
| 2007-02-04 16:40 | Stealth | Note Edited: 0013190 | |
| 2007-02-04 17:55 | djGrrr | Note Added: 0013191 | |
| 2007-02-04 17:56 | djGrrr | Note Edited: 0013191 | |
| 2007-02-04 18:00 | djGrrr | Note Edited: 0013191 | |
| 2007-02-04 19:06 | Bricker | Note Added: 0013192 | |
| 2007-04-27 03:14 |
|
Status | new => acknowledged |
| 2010-07-14 17:46 | syzop | QA | => Not touched yet by developer |
| 2010-07-14 17:46 | syzop | U4: Need for upstream patch | => No need for upstream InspIRCd patch |
| 2010-07-14 17:46 | syzop | Note Added: 0016177 | |
| 2010-07-14 17:46 | syzop | Status | acknowledged => closed |
| 2010-07-14 17:47 | syzop | Resolution | open => duplicate |
