View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0006437 | unreal | ircd | public | 2024-07-19 09:58 | 2024-07-19 17:02 |
| Reporter | Valware | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | new | Resolution | open | ||
| Summary | 0006437: Request for: Spamfilter block option for `block-no-warn` or `notice`. | ||||
| Description | Spamfilter has been improved quite heavily over the past few years. Since now it does so much more than filtering messages for potential bad things, such as letting you set tags, and have a `raw` target option, I think it'd be great to have the option be able to make a spamfilter not generate a hit notice at all. Additionally, I'd like to request being able to use spamfilter to send a notice, since with the addition of tags, we could (with a notice option) make such a customization where the admin can make a timed notice send to a person with no account ~30 mins after they connected saying how to register if they want. This would increase customizability. As for block-no-warn, for example, if someone might use spamfilter to create a lot it could get a little messy on bigger networks, especially if they are restricting things they don't need a notice for every time someone tries to use it. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| 3rd party modules | |||||
|
|
The "not generate a hit notice at all" (so no server notice to ircops / log message)... i thought we already do that if there is no action, like if there is only a spamfilter::rule. But.. yeah.. what you mean is different. Like blocking NS IDENTIFY or something but without revealing user passwords. Yeah some option would be nice. I think for config it would be nicer to make it a separate item, though. Like https://www.unrealircd.org/docs/Set_block#set::spamfilter::show-message-content-on-hit but then a spamfilter::show-message-content-on-hit (well, something shorter probably). I mean, someone will ask for it for actions other than block :). Though that leaves open the question for how to do it on the SPAMFILTER command line. Maybe just don't worry about that for now, and introduce it config-based first. (Did not read or comment on the other half) |
