View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001199 | unreal | ircd | public | 2003-08-18 19:14 | 2003-08-18 21:20 |
| Reporter | cyberCloWn | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | open | ||
| Product Version | 3.2-beta17 | ||||
| Summary | 0001199: Whois replies | ||||
| Description | Something I found which didn't make much sense. If you type /whois <nick> and the nick is not online you are sent the following response: <nick> No such nick/channel - <nick> End of /WHOIS list. When you do an advanced whois (for lack of better word) by typing /whois <nick> <nick> you are given this reponse: No such server - No such server Just wondering if that's supposed to be like that... | ||||
| 3rd party modules | |||||
|
|
It's because _I think_ originally such an advanced whois was like: whois server.where.person.is.at person (ie: whois irc.blah.net gaflag) and if you do 'whois gaflag gaflag' it will search for the server of gaflag which isn't found... blah.. fun isn't it? ;p. I'm used to it from ircnet ircd, but looks like at least the undernet ppl decided to change it :p. I prefer it this way since it's more clear that our server doesn't find the client, it didn't even query the remote server. Ah well, I'm just a bit conservative ;). |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-08-18 19:14 | cyberCloWn | New Issue | |
| 2003-08-18 21:20 | syzop | Status | new => closed |
| 2003-08-18 21:20 | syzop | Note Added: 0003496 |
