View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0001232unrealircdpublic2003-11-20 19:43
ReporterTroco Assigned Tosyzop  
PrioritynormalSeverityfeatureReproducibilityalways
Status closedResolutionfixed 
Summary0001232: /quit message with channelmode +m (or +M)
DescriptionAs you can see that with chmode +m only +%@&~ can talk and +M only +r users can talk too, I think that is would be useful that if you are in one channel with +m at least, wich you haven't voice or higher, when you type /quit message, the message should be replaced with "Client exited" or anything; the same with +M (if you aren't +r).
3rd party modules

Activities

syzop

2003-09-05 23:23

administrator   ~0003598

yeah I had this idea too. But... Personally I'm always in 1 +m room where I receive up to date news information so that would mean my quit msgs are always stripped.. that sucks ;p
Hmmm I see that part reasons aren't stripped for +M when you are not +r, I'll fix that.

I just think of a funny workaround: let the user part without reason (or with reason 'Client exiting' or something) from the affected channels and quit it then. I'm... insane...

Troco

2003-09-05 23:31

reporter   ~0003600

That's true, but try to use
/hope hello!
/hope world!!
/hope how
/hope are
/hope you?
using latest mIRC version, fex. In despite of the fact that the channel is +m (or +M) I can send text to the channel, I can "talk", and I can spam.

syzop

2003-09-05 23:41

administrator   ~0003601

/hope is not an mIRC command (yes I've 6.1), probably scripted :P.
But if it quits with that message and then reconnects+rejoins then YES I KNOW, I've known that for years and I just explained that I was thinking about a good solution to do something about it without affecting the "good guys".

(On a sidenote, if a user is able to do this many quit commands at your network you should have a look at throttling ;p.)

Troco

2003-09-06 00:29

reporter   ~0003604

ough, I meant /hop (lapsus linguae). I advice that if you are thinking to leave out part with +M (referer: Hmmm I see that part reasons aren't stripped for +M when you are not +r, I'll fix that.)

syzop

2003-09-06 00:41

administrator   ~0003605

Hm it still makes no sense but that doesn't matter ;). +M part thingy fixed in .1909.

This bug/feature request is rejected for now. Maybe we will reconsider it about a few months, I don't know.. I don't like the removing of quit msg, and the part solution is ugly code (=usually dangerous/unstable) so I don't want to put it in :|.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2003-09-05 22:31 Troco New Issue
2003-09-05 23:23 syzop Note Added: 0003598
2003-09-05 23:31 Troco Note Added: 0003600
2003-09-05 23:41 syzop Note Added: 0003601
2003-09-06 00:29 Troco Note Added: 0003604
2003-09-06 00:41 syzop Status new => resolved
2003-09-06 00:41 syzop Resolution open => fixed
2003-09-06 00:41 syzop Assigned To => syzop
2003-09-06 00:41 syzop Note Added: 0003605
2003-11-20 19:43 syzop Status resolved => closed