View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0001368unrealircdpublic2004-02-01 01:33
ReporterExael23 Assigned To 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityalways
Status closedResolutionopen 
Product Version3.2-beta18 
Summary0001368: Incorrect hostname when restart
DescriptionWhen making a WHOIS shows different hostname depends on the server where it finds me.
Steps To ReproduceA user (no oper) in servidor1 with a hostname changed by bots.
When join servidor2, the users who enter servidor2 see a hostname different that the users from servidor1.
Additional Informationmy bots when entering a user the servers, they change the hostname to all.
Testing in a server Windows and other linux redhat, The
server linux is united to the server Windows.
3rd party modules

Activities

syzop

2003-11-15 16:15

administrator   ~0004038

could you give an example? (paste of which hostnames, how it looks like, etc..)

Exael23

2003-11-15 17:18

reporter   ~0004039

Last edited: 2003-11-15 23:37

1-I'm in server irc.centralfusion.net {
/whois Shirey Shirey
  Shirey [email protected] *
  Servidor: iRC.CeNTRaLFuSioN.NeT Servidor Hub

2-Now the irc2.centralfusion.net is united {
[18:09] (link) ZIPLink iRC.CeNTRaLFuSioN.NeT -> irc2.centralfusion.net[@192.168.0.8.1027] established
[18:09](link) ZIPLink irc2.centralfusion.net -> iRC.CeNTRaLFuSioN.NeT[@192.168.0.1.0] established
.....}

3-A user in irc2.centralfusion.net does /whois Shirey {
   Shirey [email protected] *
   Servidor: iRC.CeNTRaLFuSioN.NeT Servidor Hub
}

NOTE: If instead of "/WHOIS Shirey" I use "/WHOIS Shirey Shirey" she sees
well.

editada el: 11-15-03 17:21

editada el: 11-15-03 23:37

syzop

2003-11-16 04:08

administrator   ~0004044

Hm, 2F349CE6.BFA96CE0.7A5319BF.IP is his cloaked ip, and the [email protected] is done by the /chghost (or /vhost?)?

Exael23

2003-11-16 10:45

reporter   ~0004045

the 1clk-891b.virtual is done by the /chghost

syzop

2003-11-18 15:10

administrator   ~0004060

Well I can't reproduce it here.
1. I connect to server A
2. Someone does /chghost A bla.whatever
3. Server A and server B link
4. I /whois the person at server A from server B

Host is correct (good).

Both servers are beta18?

Exael23

2003-11-19 16:58

reporter   ~0004062

Yes, both servers are beta18.

Your you can see it in irc.centralfusion.net (server1) and
217.217.252.92 (server2) the user that I see the failure is serverA on #canal

In the end I have had to mount it in two server Windows because linux I
have it in LAN

Exael23

2003-11-22 13:17

reporter   ~0004077

Last edited: 2003-11-22 13:19

I already have found the reason for the error. I have united a text where it is possible to be seen like reproducing the error:

******************************************
(BOTS<=SERVER)NICK ADMINISTRADOR 1 1069371718 KKline 192.168.0.3 iRC.CeNTRaLFuSioN.NeT 0 :f
(BOTS<=SERVER):ADMINISTRADOR MODE ADMINISTRADOR :+wx

(BOTS=>SERVER):NiCK CHGHOST ADMINISTRADOR :da9-2p5h.virtual

(BOTS=>SERVER):NiCK NOTICE ADMINISTRADOR :Su dirección IP ha sido codificada para evitar ataques a su máquina.
(BOTS=>SERVER):SeRViDoR.De.RoBoTS 928 ADMINISTRADOR :  B i e N V e N i D @ S   A   iRC.CeNTRaLFuSioN.NeT
(BOTS=>SERVER)SVSMODE ADMINISTRADOR -torhi 000000000
******************************************

If the line "SVSMODE ADMINISTRADOR -torhi 000000000" did not exist the servers they work well.
Is the syntax formulated good?

Thank you.

editada el: 11-22-03 13:19

medice

2003-11-22 13:36

reporter   ~0004078

just a little thought - maybe there are different cloaking-keys which mess the whole thing up?

Exael23

2003-11-22 14:34

reporter   ~0004079

No, I have verified that all "cloak-keys" is equal. The failure really
reproduces when the bots send line SVSMODE that I put previously.

syzop

2003-11-22 14:39

administrator   ~0004080

Sorry Exael23 for not replying to your email, I simply forgot :/.

It probably has something to do with the "-t" in the SVSMODE... normally it's -tx (if I remember correctly, but I'm not 100% sure), so I think that's the problem.

Btw, why the -t in the SVSMODE? Looks like it isn't needed? ;)

syzop

2004-02-01 01:33

administrator   ~0004834

This was homemade-services problem :).

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2003-11-15 15:44 Exael23 New Issue
2003-11-15 16:15 syzop Note Added: 0004038
2003-11-15 17:18 Exael23 Note Added: 0004039
2003-11-15 17:21 Exael23 Note Edited: 0004039
2003-11-15 23:37 Exael23 Note Edited: 0004039
2003-11-16 04:08 syzop Note Added: 0004044
2003-11-16 10:45 Exael23 Note Added: 0004045
2003-11-18 15:10 syzop Note Added: 0004060
2003-11-19 16:58 Exael23 Note Added: 0004062
2003-11-22 13:17 Exael23 Note Added: 0004077
2003-11-22 13:19 Exael23 Note Edited: 0004077
2003-11-22 13:36 medice Note Added: 0004078
2003-11-22 14:34 Exael23 Note Added: 0004079
2003-11-22 14:39 syzop Note Added: 0004080
2004-02-01 01:33 syzop Status new => closed
2004-02-01 01:33 syzop Note Added: 0004834