View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001577 | unreal | ircd | public | 2004-02-22 00:23 | 2004-02-23 10:05 |
| Reporter | White_Magic | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | closed | Resolution | open | ||
| Summary | 0001577: ChanMode +E (Umode +r needed to use +E) | ||||
| Description | had a discussion with a friend called zero and its his idea on about this, ChanMode +E works same way as +e except you cant enter without umode +r (of course this is a nickname only exception.) | ||||
| 3rd party modules | |||||
|
|
Hmmm , what's wrong with setting channel mode +R? Just curious, You might have other reasons though , who knows........ edited on: 2004-02-22 00:28 |
|
|
well atm the chanmode +e is based on *!*@* either 1 of the 3 or 2 of the 3 or all 3 ( if u know what i mean ) also u dont need a registered nickname. this means, ban walking a channel is easy, nick!*@* ( change to nickname ) *!Ident@* ( change to ident ) *!ident@*.ip ( change to ident + ip ) nick!*@*.ip ( change to nickname on IP ) etc etc, channel mode R is dominant over +e, so yes mode +R will stop them from using the +e on a unregged nickname , but chances r the channel wont be using +R to allow " guests " to join the channel, this is why i ask :) |
|
|
Sounds pretty useless to me. Give a scenario where you would need this. |
|
|
Ok, right now, on the server im an ircop on, theres a teen room where the akick list consists of masks like this *!*@*.ipt.aol.com *!*@*.ok.ok.cox.net *!*@*.sd.sd.cox.net *!*@*.sua.bellsouth.net *!*@*.chvlva.adelphia.net *!*@*.cfl.rr.com *!*@*.mad.east.verizon.net *!*@*.lv.lv.cox.net *!*@*.ip.alltel.net *!*@*.quadspeedi.net *!*@*.Richmond1.Level3.net *!*@*stignatius.net *!*@*.Dial1.Atlanta1.Level3.net the channel exception list, has 35 entires ( which im not gonna list ) but 20 of them are listed as " nick!*@* " this is so the channel ops and regulagrs can over come the bans already set. 30 exceptions you have to admit is pretty high and becoz 20 of them are " nick!*@* " anyomne who sees that list, can be a smart n change there nickname and ban walk into the channel causing problems, ( most of the channel ops are webtv users btw ) - yes its seems benefical to " my " side only but, who knows for sure ( the reason for the akicks listed is to stop flooders and yeah it works ) if it was changed / made for umode +r needed to use the +E or (e) then that kills off people easily accessing the channel thru someone elses +e to me in my eyes, nickserv times / kills you from using someone elses nickname, i see the same should be used in this system if +e or +E belongs to someone in the format ( nick!*@* ) so shouldnt it be made so that only that user effected by the mode should have the access rights to use it??? Thanks for the discussion btw guys =) |
|
|
Ok well the first thing is, +e will _definately not_ be changed to do that. That would break everyone who uses +e for the way it currently works. As for creating a +E, it still doesn't seem to make too much sense to me. I can see your point, but it seems to me this is more of a services feature. I mean we don't have +B nick!*@* to only apply to unregistered nicks, why do we need a +E that applies to only registered nicks? It seems like something that should be in services. |
|
|
Ok, would it cause you more work if u created a extended +e system, as you have in +b, where the " extended " part would check if the user affected is a registered nickname? ( if its any exception? ). |
|
|
There is already an extended exception system in place. |
|
|
Ok, i`ll have someone else request it in services :) ty |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-02-22 00:23 | White_Magic | New Issue | |
| 2004-02-22 00:27 | AI | Note Added: 0005141 | |
| 2004-02-22 00:28 | AI | Note Edited: 0005141 | |
| 2004-02-22 00:41 | White_Magic | Note Added: 0005144 | |
| 2004-02-22 00:57 |
|
Note Added: 0005145 | |
| 2004-02-22 12:49 | White_Magic | Note Added: 0005149 | |
| 2004-02-22 13:26 |
|
Note Added: 0005150 | |
| 2004-02-22 13:30 | White_Magic | Note Added: 0005152 | |
| 2004-02-22 13:33 |
|
Note Added: 0005153 | |
| 2004-02-22 13:35 | White_Magic | Note Added: 0005154 | |
| 2004-02-23 10:05 | syzop | Status | new => closed |
