View Issue Details

Jump to NotesJump to History
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0001753unrealircdpublic2004-04-22 20:292006-02-14 13:21
ReporterZell Assigned To 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityalways
Status closedResolutionfixed 
Product Version3.2-beta19 
Summary0001753: bug on /who flag +m
Description-- see additional info
Additional InformationWhen u run /who +m o all the IRCops with +H are hidden even if you are +o yourself

When u run /who 0 o it shows all the IRCops that are in the rooms you are in, even if they are +H -- BUG! and also /who +m N doesnt show Netadmins....
3rd party modules

Activities

White_Magic

2004-04-22 20:32

reporter   ~0005907

my only question is, are ircops ment to see other ircops who have +H?
if so then yes theres a bug becoz me and zell both dont get a result, if not, then i can understand. (Why would ircops want to hide from the other ircops anyway?)

Zell

2004-04-22 20:37

reporter   ~0005908

bingo... like what is join-on-oper for? lol... they took off invisible users a while ago for that reason lol

syzop

2004-04-22 21:00

administrator   ~0005909

The /who +m thingy was fixed a week ago or so in CVS. Yes, +H opers should be shown as opers to other opers (wow, interresting sentence).

As for your other stuff, I'll take a look at it later, will be fixed after 3.2.

Oh I presume you mean that +H ircops are shown in '/who 0 o' if the command is issued by an oper, wasn't able to reproduce that as a normal user.

Zell

2004-04-22 21:04

reporter   ~0005910

right, tested this as oper. assuming normal users are still denied the information (hopefully)

Rocko

2004-04-29 06:32

reporter   ~0005945

Last edited: 2004-04-29 06:35

 /who 0 o or /who +m o doesn't show ircops to normal users, should be fixed too.

bearbeitet am: 2004-04-29 06:35

aquanight

2004-04-29 09:34

reporter   ~0005946

>/who 0 o or /who +m o doesn't show ircops to normal users, should be fixed too.

If those opers are +H, of course they wouldn't be shown to normal users!

Rocko

2004-04-29 09:39

reporter   ~0005950

They wasn't +H.
Tested on 3.2-Final

w00t

2004-04-29 19:30

reporter   ~0005955

aquanight,

Are you able to read the posts before replying? Because that is something that you dont really seem to be doing. The whole discussion was about them having +H. It was omitted once, and you assumed. Please dont.

As for /who +m N, I refer to the helpop documentation:
"Flag m <usermodes>: user has <usermodes> set on them, only o/A/a for nonopers"
I dont know why this is, but thats what it is.

codemastr

2004-05-04 13:56

reporter   ~0006044

About the not showing any opers... are the opers +i?

Zell

2004-05-04 14:26

reporter   ~0006048

Yep the opers are +i, but that should only affect getting their name from an external /NAMES, right?

Rocko

2004-05-04 14:52

reporter   ~0006049

Zell, you was too fast ;)

@codemastr: Yes, they was +i. Well, haven't thought about that this could be the reason, but shouldn't a /who +m o works for normal users, even if the IRCops have +i?
I mean, every IRCop is +i... normally all users are getting +i on connect, and there isn't any way, to excempt IRCops from that, because set:modes-on-oper only works with setting modes, not unsetting ;)

codemastr

2004-05-04 15:28

reporter   ~0006052

I'll have to think about it...

Stealth

2004-05-22 13:54

reporter   ~0006372

+i is supposed to hide people in /who unless they are in a common channel with the person issuing the /who alond with hiding people in an external names list

(in other words, +i hides you unless the person knows where you are, it is that way to stop spambots from connecting, /who *, and spamming off the list returned.)

w00t

2004-05-23 19:28

reporter   ~0006393

Heh yeah, so they just run /list, join a random channel and spam all the participants.

Stealth

2004-05-24 02:02

reporter   ~0006398

And that is what chmode +s is used for.

Zell

2006-01-17 00:06

reporter   ~0010976

This stuffie has been long fixed -- close bug?

[Sorry, i'm running thru the list of stuff under my "reported" list on My View -- open bugs are cluttering it :-P]

syzop

2006-02-14 13:21

administrator   ~0011238

*nod* the reported issue was fixed long ago indeed.

As for opers showing up in /who regardless of +i state.. let's just keep it at a 'no'.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2004-04-22 20:29 Zell New Issue
2004-04-22 20:32 White_Magic Note Added: 0005907
2004-04-22 20:37 Zell Note Added: 0005908
2004-04-22 21:00 syzop Note Added: 0005909
2004-04-22 21:04 Zell Note Added: 0005910
2004-04-29 06:32 Rocko Note Added: 0005945
2004-04-29 06:34 Rocko Note Edited: 0005945
2004-04-29 06:35 Rocko Note Edited: 0005945
2004-04-29 09:34 aquanight Note Added: 0005946
2004-04-29 09:39 Rocko Note Added: 0005950
2004-04-29 19:30 w00t Note Added: 0005955
2004-05-04 13:56 codemastr Note Added: 0006044
2004-05-04 14:26 Zell Note Added: 0006048
2004-05-04 14:52 Rocko Note Added: 0006049
2004-05-04 15:28 codemastr Note Added: 0006052
2004-05-22 13:54 Stealth Note Added: 0006372
2004-05-23 19:28 w00t Note Added: 0006393
2004-05-24 02:02 Stealth Note Added: 0006398
2006-01-17 00:06 Zell Note Added: 0010976
2006-02-14 13:21 syzop Status new => closed
2006-02-14 13:21 syzop Note Added: 0011238
2006-02-14 13:21 syzop Resolution open => fixed