View Issue Details
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0002096||unreal||ircd||public||2004-09-27 23:09||2004-11-13 12:25|
|Target Version||Fixed in Version||3.2.3|
|Summary||0002096: Who flag for bots|
|Description||i went to do some eggy work and wanted to find all the bots in a 200 + people channel, i was almost certain the /who system had a flag to find " bots " only but it seems it dont - this would be useful for opers /chanops to find bots with +B umode.|
|Tags||No tags attached.|
|3rd party modules|
||/who +m B|
||duh i know there was a way, thanks syzop - im off to bed now *hangs head in shame lol*|
||I should point out that only works for IRCops...|
-> irc-m08.icq.aol.com WHO +m B
<- :irc-m08.icq.aol.com 315 Desolator +m :End of /WHO list.
-> irc-m08.icq.aol.com WHO +m B #Exotica
<- :irc-m08.icq.aol.com 315 Desolator +m :End of /WHO list.
/who #Exoctica +m B - just returns a normal /who #Exotica
the channel is full of bots as well,
DefuckinMented is MeNtAL@115C9317.2FACC459.559BA39.IP * chingAlingLING
DefuckinMented is a registered nick
DefuckinMented on @#Scottish %#phoe @#Bitch-X @#CitY_ChaT @#novkortera ^#forsaken @#exotica
DefuckinMented using irc-m08.icq.aol.com IrCQnet
DefuckinMented is a Bot on IrCQnet
DefuckinMented has been idle 40hrs 43mins 6secs, signed on Sat Oct 16 20:08:24
DefuckinMented End of /WHOIS list.
Dickdiggler is wh0rebag@9208D73E.2FACC459.559BA39.IP * Its gettin hot in here
Dickdiggler is a registered nick
Dickdiggler on @#Scottish @#Bitch-X %#phoe @#CitY_ChaT @#novkortera @#forsaken @#exotica
Dickdiggler using irc-m05.icq.aol.com IrCQnet
Dickdiggler is a Bot on IrCQnet
Dickdiggler End of /WHOIS list.
Bella is pip@F4DF5297.ECFAB7AE.559BA39.IP * Blacklight
Bella is a registered nick
Bella on @#colombia @#exotica %#phoe @#novkortera
Bella using irc-m08.icq.aol.com IrCQnet
Bella is a Bot on IrCQnet
Bella End of /WHOIS list.
how come i cant make it work for a channel - im presumming /who +m B requires ircop but....
||/who +cm #Exoctica B|
-> irc-m08.icq.aol.com WHO +cm #Exotica B
<- :irc-m08.icq.aol.com 315 Desolator +cm :End of /WHO list.
|I'm not quite sure I understand the problem...|
the orginal problem was a way to dectect is anyone have umode +B set, but Syzop showed me the /who covered that, the problem NOW is, im not an ircop i am +q in 10 channels whihc contain eggy drop bots with umode +B and i cannot make /who return *only bots* to me, using the following commands have failed..
WHO +m B
WHO +m B #Exotica
WHO #Exoctica +m B
i tryed Aquanights suggestion which was
WHO +cm #Exotica B
this also failed, how do i make it work?????
||I can't seem to reproduce the problem...|
[quote]im not an ircop[/quote]
Well that's why. As aquanight already said, you *must* be an IRCOp. +q is irrelevant, that doesn't make you an IRCOp. The /who +m B flag will not work unless you are an oper. So I don't see a bug here...
||Shouldnt it work for Ops thou if it involes +c ?|
Flag m <usermodes>: user has <usermodes> set, **********ONLY o/C/A/a/N FOR NONOPERS**********
ChanOP != Oper :P
||/who +c for channel!|
||So you're saying a user who is normally not allowed to see usermodes should be able to get them through an alternative method?|
Only reason I left this bug open is so there could be some discussion about letting users do +m B, since basically they already can see who is a bot and who isn't (via whois). [note that stuff like +/-m does not suddenly allow the user to view MORE users than with normal '/who', rather.. it restricts the output]
my reply to aquanight is, no not allow them as such but since ops are required to run a channel, i feel they should have the ablity to use the /who to see who has *which* conditions in the channel there in, for example whos bots, whos away, whose here, whos idle for or more than X time?((?) if its possible)
||syzop: By that logic there'd be a few other modes to enable as well. +z and +h to name two. Since users can probably tell who's using a hidden host by whois, maybe let them do x too, though this could be a bad idea since it could give nasty people a way to find non-invisible, ip-wide-open users to "play with", but who doesn't set::modes-on-connect "+ix" and set::restrict-user-modes "ix" ? :P (Actually, I don't, but still...)|
Maybe this should be something returned by /who as a flag, instead of a command flag.
A new flag such as "B" would do, and clients can be scripted to only return the users with this flag.
|I kind of like both ideas. Allow +B searching, and also show a B in the flags.|
||Both ideas would be great if implimented.|
codemastr: how are you gonna deal with breaking numerics then?
(I'm sure you have some idea about it ;p)
edited on: 2004-10-29 17:36
|I don't see how this would break any numerics?|
hm? Odd.. I thought I had posted a comment here.
Anyway, ignore that breaking-numerics-statement.. I misunderstood the proposed idea.
|Added in .181|
|2004-09-27 23:09||White_Magic||New Issue|
|2004-09-27 23:11||syzop||Note Added: 0007810|
|2004-09-27 23:59||White_Magic||Note Added: 0007811|
|2004-09-28 01:55||aquanight||Note Added: 0007812|
|2004-10-18 08:18||White_Magic||Note Added: 0008035|
|2004-10-18 11:32||aquanight||Note Added: 0008036|
|2004-10-18 11:54||White_Magic||Note Added: 0008037|
||Note Added: 0008043|
|2004-10-21 11:16||White_Magic||Note Added: 0008056|
|2004-10-22 00:30||aquanight||Note Added: 0008060|
||Note Added: 0008061|
|2004-10-22 15:40||White_Magic||Note Added: 0008063|
|2004-10-22 15:42||aquanight||Note Added: 0008064|
|2004-10-22 15:44||White_Magic||Note Added: 0008065|
|2004-10-22 15:57||aquanight||Note Added: 0008066|
|2004-10-22 16:01||syzop||Note Added: 0008067|
|2004-10-22 16:21||White_Magic||Note Added: 0008068|
|2004-10-22 16:39||aquanight||Note Added: 0008069|
|2004-10-22 17:04||Stealth||Note Added: 0008070|
||Note Added: 0008174|
|2004-10-29 17:33||Stealth||Note Added: 0008178|
|2004-10-29 17:35||syzop||Note Added: 0008179|
|2004-10-29 17:36||syzop||Note Edited: 0008179|
||Note Added: 0008181|
|2004-11-07 10:38||syzop||Note Added: 0008262|
||Status||new => assigned|
||Assigned To||=> codemastr|
||Summary||new who flag => Who flag for bots|
||Status||assigned => resolved|
||Fixed in Version||=> 3.2.3|
||Resolution||open => fixed|
||Note Added: 0008302|