View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0002223 | unreal | ircd | public | 2004-12-05 16:49 | 2005-02-12 20:14 |
| Reporter | Stealth | Assigned To | syzop | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | block | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Fixed in Version | 3.2.3 | ||||
| Summary | 0002223: ban version: action shun | ||||
| Description | It seems that the shun action in ban version blocks doesnt work. When tested, no shun was added for the user with the unwanted version. The block it was tested with is in the Additional Info | ||||
| Additional Information | ban version { mask "*mirc*"; reason "...."; action shun; }; | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| 3rd party modules | |||||
|
|
Oh... I think it adds the shun but does not apply it to the current users :p. |
|
|
I wonder how long this bug has been here... Maybe the other actions should be tested to see if they work too :P |
|
|
Something else about ban version: It seems the except ban is not effective with the kline action. I wonder about the stuff in except tkl too :) |
|
|
[quote] I wonder how long this bug has been here... Maybe the other actions should be tested to see if they work too :P[/quote] Do you think nobody uses spamfilter? lol :PP The 'shun' target is just not popular, I wouldn't use it either... shun stuff is done differently than other TKL*'s by a subfunction, hence it failed to apply to current users. This will of course be fixed. [quote]It seems the except ban is not effective with the kline action.[/quote] Works fine here. |
|
|
[quote]It seems the except ban is not effective with the kline action.[/quote] Or actually.. what do you mean ?? :P *lines/etc are just added, except .. has nothing to do with that, it's just that they shouldn't disconnect the user if exempted... or did you find a situation where it does? |
|
|
Don't worry, it works. The person testing it had "except ban { *@*; };" |
|
|
uh I suppose I misread half of this post (!spamfilter), but anyway.. confirmed, w/shun action it doesn't do a thing :P. |
|
|
I'm confused by my earlier comments, but anyway... Fixed shuns not working in spamfilter, and I presume this affected ban version { } as well (I only tested that it's fixed now :p). Fixed in .266. (it were 2 bugs btw). |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-12-05 16:49 | Stealth | New Issue | |
| 2004-12-05 16:51 | syzop | Note Added: 0008513 | |
| 2004-12-05 16:54 | Stealth | Note Added: 0008514 | |
| 2004-12-05 16:55 | Stealth | Note Edited: 0008514 | |
| 2004-12-05 16:58 | Stealth | Note Added: 0008515 | |
| 2004-12-05 17:03 | syzop | Note Added: 0008516 | |
| 2004-12-05 17:06 | syzop | Note Added: 0008517 | |
| 2004-12-05 17:12 | Stealth | Note Added: 0008518 | |
| 2004-12-06 12:40 | syzop | Status | new => confirmed |
| 2004-12-06 12:40 | syzop | Note Added: 0008528 | |
| 2005-02-12 20:14 | syzop | Status | confirmed => resolved |
| 2005-02-12 20:14 | syzop | Fixed in Version | => 3.2.3 |
| 2005-02-12 20:14 | syzop | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2005-02-12 20:14 | syzop | Assigned To | => syzop |
| 2005-02-12 20:14 | syzop | Note Added: 0009112 |
