View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0002361unrealircdpublic2005-02-22 20:15
Reporterpak Assigned To 
PrioritynormalSeverityfeatureReproducibilityN/A
Status closedResolutionopen 
Product Version3.2.2 
Summary0002361: /who flag for users on no channels
DescriptionCurrently there is a flag to list people that are in a specific channel (+c) or not in a specific channel (-c).

As it stands it it is not possible to list just users that are in no channels. This could be a useful feature, one reason for it is the some bots do not join channels, others are effectively rallied outside of channels, then once are ready are ordered to join a channel to flood. It is difficult to find them if they are not in a channel or do not have any recognisable nick/ident/gecos pattern

perhaps use "/who +c *" or another independant flag
TagsNo tags attached.
3rd party modules

Relationships

duplicate of 0001518 resolvedWolfSage Way to list users outside any channel and improved who functionality 

Activities

White_Magic

2005-02-21 19:37

reporter   ~0009227

wrong with /who alone? - ok so that lists everyone connected, but still, did u try finding users without a registered nickname? that would list them, sure it lists some other users as well but it still works - the flag ur asking for will still list users, or innceont chatters,

pak

2005-02-21 19:52

reporter   ~0009229

currently of the 2300 users we have connected, 1100 are unregistered/unidentified.

In comparison 116 users are currently not in channels, just scanning through this without even checking the clients a large number are displying bot like nicks/idents and gecoses, it is much easier to sort through this list than it is the 1100

Stealth

2005-02-21 20:10

reporter   ~0009231

IIRC, this is already on someone's TODO list.

pak

2005-02-21 20:16

reporter   ~0009232

are the todo lists posted anywhere? I searched here but couldn't find anything relevant, although i may have missed it

syzop

2005-02-22 20:15

administrator   ~0009252

dup of 0001518
perhaps I'll take a look at this, we'll see...

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2005-02-20 18:33 pak New Issue
2005-02-21 19:37 White_Magic Note Added: 0009227
2005-02-21 19:52 pak Note Added: 0009229
2005-02-21 20:10 Stealth Note Added: 0009231
2005-02-21 20:16 pak Note Added: 0009232
2005-02-22 20:14 syzop Relationship added duplicate of 0001518
2005-02-22 20:15 syzop Status new => closed
2005-02-22 20:15 syzop Note Added: 0009252