View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0002602 | unreal | ircd | public | 2005-07-27 14:45 | 2015-05-30 15:29 |
| Reporter | pinstrate | Assigned To | syzop | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| OS | any | OS Version | any | ||
| Product Version | 3.2.4 | ||||
| Fixed in Version | 3.4-alpha3 | ||||
| Summary | 0002602: Some feature suggests for Unreal 3.3* | ||||
| Description | It would be great for Unreal 3.3* if: * /rehash -dns could rehash the whole dns system (w/o restart): rereal /etc/resolv.conf, apply the new nameserver(s), flush cache and etc.. * more stuff would be modulized: let's say if i don't want to have a 'foo' feature, I just remove that module and that's all. No need to think, modify source and etc.. any my offtopic opinion: also it would be nice it Unreal would become a more serious ircd ;) I mean, no such stuff like bot* (botmode, botmotd and etc) and other, which most people don't use :) BTW: good luck in 3.3* developement! | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| 3rd party modules | |||||
|
|
I fail to see why the bot* stuff would be not serious... IMO it's a good way to distinct bots from normal users, I can imagine some networks even enforcing rules such as that bots should be always +B and stuff like that. dns.. yeah modulizing.. well, in many cases it only makes the code more comlicated.. like modlizing operoverride to name something, in such cases it is better if it is a simple setting. But if you want to simply rip out a command, then that is already possible (load the m_*.so individually instead of commands.so, and rename/delete the command you want to get rid of). Although perhaps a config item could be added. (That said, I *hate* those people who disable LUSERS, NAMES, etc "for security" in which case 99% of these people are in fact running zombie servers). You are free to suggest additional possible settings though, like to disable certain things or make them behave differently (so.. basically, be a bit more concrete) Something else I thought of though: I think it's a good idea to have something like ::disable-usermodes and ::disable-chanmodes... the difference with ::restrict-* would be that they are really disabled in a sense that not even opers or services can set them anymore. |
|
|
I like the disable chan/usermodes, it is a good idea |
|
|
I had thought about suggesting a disable-like thing once... :) |
|
|
[quote]any my offtopic opinion: also it would be nice it Unreal would become a more serious ircd ;) I mean, no such stuff like bot* (botmode, botmotd and etc) and other, which most people don't use :)[/quote] Just because most people don't use it doesn't mean it should be removed. The people who do use it obviously like it. Also, just because something isn't frequently used doesn't make the IRCd "less serious." |
|
|
Done in 3.4.x alpha's |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-07-27 14:45 | pinstrate | New Issue | |
| 2005-07-27 14:55 | syzop | Note Added: 0010270 | |
| 2005-07-27 16:03 | Stealth | Note Added: 0010271 | |
| 2005-07-28 00:55 | aquanight | Note Added: 0010272 | |
| 2005-08-15 14:50 |
|
Note Added: 0010339 | |
| 2007-04-27 04:08 |
|
Status | new => acknowledged |
| 2015-05-30 15:28 | syzop | Note Added: 0018378 | |
| 2015-05-30 15:28 | syzop | Status | acknowledged => closed |
| 2015-05-30 15:29 | syzop | Assigned To | => syzop |
| 2015-05-30 15:29 | syzop | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2015-05-30 15:29 | syzop | Fixed in Version | => 3.4-alpha3 |
