View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0002619 | unreal | ircd | public | 2005-08-13 18:06 | 2005-11-08 10:27 |
| Reporter | beskov | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | wont fix | ||
| Product Version | 3.2.3 | ||||
| Summary | 0002619: What commands to /shun | ||||
| Description | Could you add a feature to make /shun for a specific command(s)? For example, I don't what a special user to use /whois command. You possibly can add some flags to /shun command: --exclude-commands and --include-commands (by default if will affect ALL commands, as it is now). Thanks a lot | ||||
| 3rd party modules | |||||
|
|
This is not the way irc works: you're limiting user rights and his/her freedom to communicate. Personally, I think that such commands as /shun and etc should not be included in any ircd (at worst, external module should be). That's why I don't like Unrealircd very much. The only reason I use it -- beacause of spamfilter feature. On the other hand, adding such feature would make the usage of the command very complex: you'd have to look at the documentation each time you want to /shun a user if you don't want to make any syntax mistakes.. |
|
|
If to follow you, one can say, that baning a user is limiting his/her right to freely communicate. Spamfilter? Oh my god, you are violating the freedom of speech!!! Hail USA!! Speaking about the complicity: That won't touch today's usage of shun - it will just add some options to it. |
|
|
well I don't want to argue but: with spamfilter you'te not violating the freedom of speech, but violating the speech of viruses, trojans and etc, not user's speech. and about banning the user: you ban him from your channel (beacause it is yours and the rules are yours) mostly because he/she does something wrong, breakes the rules and etc, so the transgressor in this case is the user, not you :) anyway, stupid and offtopic discussion :) |
|
|
There's a cmdshun module... |
|
|
Nice, thanks you.. Hope this module will work fine, in spite of the fact that it is experimental and for Unreal 3.2.1 |
|
|
[quote]This is not the way irc works: you're limiting user rights and his/her freedom to communicate.[/quote] IRC is a private, moderated medium. No one has any "rights" nor any "freedom" to do anything that the admin chooses not to allow them to do. That being said, I see no reason to disable specific commands. It will add needless complexity to the code as well as to the user's ability to configure this. If you want it, I say, use the existing module. |
|
|
This should really be marked closed some time... |
|
|
A check for this would require too much CPU and cause floods to strain cause problems. Shun code is intended to be as simple as possible, and it sets a single binary flag currently to indicate you can only indicate a simple subset of commands that are in no way abusive. This idea would require an extra data field for everyone. I'm closing this bug |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-08-13 18:06 | beskov | New Issue | |
| 2005-08-14 06:45 | pinstrate | Note Added: 0010329 | |
| 2005-08-14 06:56 | beskov | Note Added: 0010330 | |
| 2005-08-14 07:10 | pinstrate | Note Added: 0010331 | |
| 2005-08-14 11:37 | aquanight | Note Added: 0010332 | |
| 2005-08-14 13:12 | beskov | Note Added: 0010333 | |
| 2005-08-15 14:38 |
|
Note Added: 0010335 | |
| 2005-11-05 11:49 | w00t | Note Added: 0010651 | |
| 2005-11-08 10:25 |
|
Note Added: 0010671 | |
| 2005-11-08 10:27 |
|
Status | new => closed |
| 2005-11-08 10:27 |
|
Resolution | open => wont fix |
