|
|
Maybe while on the subject of SSL certs, it might be nice if ssl certs could be used anywhere a password is (if we can't already that is). Especially good for, say, allow {} because then the PASS :thing can be ignored and sent to nickserv? |
|
|
|
Make your own bug report :P (jk)
That sounds good, but last time I requested something with the allow code they said Sts had it so monkeyed he himself couldn't desipher it |
|
|
stskeeps
2007-02-19 13:56
reporter
~0013228
|
Err.. ssl client certs can be used anywhre a password is .. afaik.. Where we use Auth_check or wtf it was called |
|
|
stskeeps
2007-04-13 06:47
reporter
~0013372
|
We could probably help this issue a bit by implementing SSL certificate fingerprint authentication method.. please see 0003254 |
|
|
stskeeps
2007-04-15 03:48
reporter
~0013380
|
Implemented in 3.3-alpha, .2344 with SSL client certificate fingerprints (0003254). Does this fullfill your need? |
|
|
|
Yes, this does indeed fulfill my need. I still however would like to see this happen, because even you pointed out it isn't as good as comparing the actual certificate. It is at least great we have a way to use certificates though :)
(I actually don't use remote includes myself, so fingerprints are one better than this for me. Good job :D ) |
|
