View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0003263 | unreal | ircd | public | 2007-03-23 00:39 | 2007-03-23 13:58 |
| Reporter | Shining Phoenix | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
| Product Version | 3.2.6 | ||||
| Summary | 0003263: A new status mode between voice and halfop | ||||
| Description | I'll start with this comparison: Voice is exempt from - modes m and M (controls speaking) - silencing effect of mode b (controls speaking) - extban n (controls nickchanging) Voice can do - nothing Halfop is exempt from - mode b (controls speaking and nickchanging) - mode f (controls lots) - mode t (miscellaneous) Halfop can do - stuff So if we made a status between the two: "Supervoice" is exempt from - modes m and M (controls speaking) - mode N (controls nickchanging) - mode b (controls speaking and nickchanging) "Supervoice" can do - nothing To make this pattern work, you may have noticed some necessary changes: - exempt "supervoices" and halfops from channel mode N, or introduce another nickchange control mode (W) and exempt "supervoices" and halfops from that one. - exempt "supervoices" and not voices from the antinickchanging effect of bans - someone needs to think of a better name for this status mode Now you're going to ask, why make all these changes instead of just using a ~n:*!*@* ban? If you use ban control(b ~n,~q), the default is that a user does not match a ban and hence can do whatever. If you use binary mode control(m,M,N,C,T,W), the default is that a user can't do whatever, and needs to be given the power to. Binary mode control is easier than ban mode control. Summary: - Supervoice = status mode w with prefix ^, above voice. - Voice are no longer exempt from nickchange effect of b. - and { New nickchange control mode = W, supervoice and up are exempt or Make supervoice and up exempt from N and nickchange effect of b. } | ||||
| 3rd party modules | |||||
|
|
A reqular voice is already exempt from +b should be both talking and nick changes... so all you're suggesting is making +N not affect voiced users |
|
|
"A reqular voice is already exempt from +b should be both talking and nick changes" Wrong. Tested it. Voice cannot nickchange while normal banned and not normal or nickchange excepted. |
|
|
Sorry, but this won't be done. We already have enough levels (if not too many..). |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-03-23 00:39 | Shining Phoenix | New Issue | |
| 2007-03-23 01:12 | Stealth | Note Added: 0013320 | |
| 2007-03-23 01:13 | Stealth | Note Edited: 0013320 | |
| 2007-03-23 01:53 | Shining Phoenix | Note Added: 0013321 | |
| 2007-03-23 01:58 | Shining Phoenix | Note Edited: 0013321 | |
| 2007-03-23 13:58 | syzop | Status | new => closed |
| 2007-03-23 13:58 | syzop | Note Added: 0013324 | |
| 2007-03-23 13:58 | syzop | Resolution | open => no change required |
