View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0003310 | unreal | ircd | public | 2007-04-30 06:17 | 2015-08-08 17:54 |
| Reporter | Shining Phoenix | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | feedback | Resolution | open | ||
| Platform | i386 | OS | Linux | OS Version | 2.6.10-1.771_FC2 |
| Product Version | 3.2.6 | ||||
| Summary | 0003310: Exempt channel admins from +Q | ||||
| Description | Then you could server-side modelock +Q (Future feature which I hope will happen), thereby preventing ops from kicking each other (they can still use services to kick halfops =P), but not forcing channel admins to use services to kick when +Q is server-side modelocked on. And this means channel admins could kick when channel ops can't and when services are unavailable or the channel isn't registered. I know that currently you "can't" have channel admins in an unregistered channel... | ||||
| 3rd party modules | |||||
|
|
I rather disagree. |
|
|
Why do you disagree? |
|
|
I may agree with this BUT only for the channel owner because (with my logic) only the owner can tell to ops DONT kick. |
|
|
that makes rather more sense. but even so, I don't see the big issue with forcing them to use services. I don't think that an exception should be available at all. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-04-30 06:17 | Shining Phoenix | New Issue | |
| 2007-04-30 08:13 |
|
Status | new => feedback |
| 2007-04-30 18:56 | tabrisnet | Note Added: 0013956 | |
| 2007-04-30 22:25 | Shining Phoenix | Note Added: 0013961 | |
| 2007-04-30 22:39 | vonitsanet | Note Added: 0013963 | |
| 2007-05-01 01:45 | tabrisnet | Note Added: 0013964 | |
| 2015-08-08 17:54 | syzop | Severity | tweak => feature |
