View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0004140 | unreal | documentation | public | 2012-11-01 16:03 | 2015-08-08 17:06 |
| Reporter | Celelibi | Assigned To | syzop | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | text | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
| Summary | 0004140: WATCH specifications | ||||
| Description | As far as I know, WATCH command is not defined by any RFC and does not have any specification with a level of detail relevant to a RFC (exact syntax + numeric replies). Such a specification would be useful in order to implement its support in an irc bouncer. Moreover, the current documentation does not even talk about C/S/L arguments to the WATCH command. | ||||
| 3rd party modules | |||||
|
|
I would hold off on implementing WATCH if I were you, as there is an attempt right now to standardize MONITOR instead (which is a better form of WATCH). Hopefully WATCH can just die or something. |
|
|
We will solve this in 3.4 by switching to MONITOR, which is standardized. |
|
|
I understand the request, but have currently no intention to write a spec. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-11-01 16:03 | Celelibi | New Issue | |
| 2012-11-04 08:21 |
|
Note Added: 0017221 | |
| 2013-05-06 06:29 |
|
Note Added: 0017492 | |
| 2015-08-08 17:06 | syzop | Note Added: 0018633 | |
| 2015-08-08 17:06 | syzop | Status | new => closed |
| 2015-08-08 17:06 | syzop | Assigned To | => syzop |
| 2015-08-08 17:06 | syzop | Resolution | open => no change required |
