View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000826 | unreal | ircd | public | 2003-03-20 09:00 | 2010-04-15 10:08 |
Reporter | poisoner | Assigned To | |||
Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A |
Status | feedback | Resolution | open | ||
Product Version | 3.2-beta15 | ||||
Summary | 0000826: modes-on-connect in allow block | ||||
Description | Hi There... I think it should be a good idea to have the ability for setting usermodes on connect for specific IP-Ranges. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
3rd party modules | |||||
|
You should explain why you want such a feature to be added. Atm I can't see a valid reason why you would need it. If ppl can understand why you want it, your chances that it will be added are way better :) |
|
Ok... We use UserModes +x and +G for every User which connects... There are several customers of shell-services which use IRC-Bouncers with ugly and/or fancy vhosts. So how is it Possible to hide the real host / ip of a normal dynip isp customer and not to hide the host of bouncer-users? How could we prevent Users from administrative machines to get +G automatically ? Therefore I think, the ability to set "modes-on-connect" in an allow-block or class-block is very helpful. In an other "Feature-Request" there is a thread about a restricted mode. With the ability so set usermodes in allow-blocks you can set special ISPs to restricted mode and the other not. Got it? |
|
Yeah, and moving set::maxchannelsperuser and some more options to allow{} blocks will make the configuration much more complicated... |
|
I don't think so... You have always to decide between two things: - Something highly konfigurable and comfortable - Something simple to configure... I think that it is a good feature to have some of this config directives in an allow-block. But not only there.. IMHO it is best to have it additionaly in an allow-block to override systemwide config. This could make UnrealIRCd more interesting for some support sites, or chat-systems from companies made for their customers... |
|
just bumping this yes I realize its extremly old up I'd like to see this added. |
|
Bump. Do we need this? |
|
I would love to see this added to 3.3, along with the maxchannelsperuser |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2005-12-16 21:35 | RandomNumber | Note Added: 0010871 | |
2007-04-27 05:56 |
|
Note Added: 0013849 | |
2007-04-27 05:56 |
|
Status | new => feedback |
2010-04-15 10:08 | driew | Note Added: 0016071 |