View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0002973 | unreal | ircd | public | 2006-06-15 08:09 | 2010-11-17 17:35 |
Reporter | vonitsanet | Assigned To | |||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
OS | FreeBSD | OS Version | 6 | ||
Product Version | 3.2.5 | ||||
Summary | 0002973: override bug | ||||
Description | As netadmin with override i cant DEOP a user if i have (+h or) +o or +a -> [15:56:48] * Netadmin sets mode: +oao Netadmin user user /mode #test -o user and then the error: o user is a channel admin if i dont have any modes (h,o,a) i can override just nice and with +o i can -a. The problem is on DEOP. Another (if netadmin with override is halfopped and not opped on the channel): o user is a channel admin h user is a channel admin a user is a channel admin | ||||
Additional Information | You can give channel modes to a user with override. The problem is when you try to remove them. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
3rd party modules | |||||
|
I have to say, I've never had this problem. Sure your netadmin, not servicesadmin or etc? |
|
ME is using modes +iowghraAsRTxNWqztGp |
|
I'll be d**mned. It happens on 3.2.5, too. I was +h at channel, and every operator flag known to God and man set. I set my net comanager +q on the channel and me +h, and tested this out. Results: q tigger-away is channel owner a tigger-away is channel owner o tigger-away is channel owner (when user was +q at channel) a tigger-away is channel admin o tigger-away is channel admin (when user was +a at channel) |
|
Exactly |
|
Just tested, and verified. I think this should be fixed in 3.3. |
|
I think does not happen in 3.2.8.1 * Rejoined channel #test * Netadmin sets mode: +h Netadmin * Netadmin sets mode: +a Tester * Netadmin sets mode: +o Tester * Netadmin sets mode: +q Tester * Netadmin sets mode: -q Tester * Netadmin sets mode: -a Tester * Netadmin sets mode: -o Tester Unless this is something other than what I just tested. |
|
I've tested 15 combinations of -o'ing, and 20+ combinations of -h'ing. When I am +q, +a, +o, +h, none, and target is: +q, +a, +o, +h, in a matrix.. and well.. everything seems to work :). This bug has probably been fixed some time back then, which is quite possible with all those override bugs & fixing of those bugs :) |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2006-06-15 08:09 | vonitsanet | New Issue | |
2006-06-15 16:10 | JasonTik | Note Added: 0011957 | |
2006-06-15 20:31 | vonitsanet | Note Added: 0011962 | |
2006-06-19 01:53 | Zell | Note Added: 0011986 | |
2006-06-19 22:24 | vonitsanet | Note Added: 0011992 | |
2007-04-15 20:44 | WolfSage | Note Added: 0013425 | |
2007-04-16 11:25 |
|
Status | new => acknowledged |
2007-04-18 04:50 |
|
Relationship added | has duplicate 0003098 |
2010-07-14 17:50 | syzop | Relationship added | child of 0003776 |
2010-09-06 15:07 | ohnobinki | Status | acknowledged => assigned |
2010-09-06 15:07 | ohnobinki | Assigned To | => ohnobinki |
2010-10-22 18:53 | goldenwolf | Note Added: 0016388 | |
2010-11-17 17:35 | syzop | Note Added: 0016421 | |
2010-11-17 17:35 | syzop | Status | assigned => closed |
2010-11-17 17:35 | syzop | Assigned To | ohnobinki => |
2010-11-17 17:35 | syzop | Resolution | open => no change required |